Copyright: Joint Ownership

This article may be read in conjunction with a previous article, "Copyright:  Authorship Basics," and 2 subsequent articles - "Works For Hire" and "Assignments of Copyright." 

Have you ever collaborated with someone to create an artistic work?  If so, maybe it has crossed your mind to wonder who owns the copyright.

Here's the basic rule for joint ownership of copyrights:

1. When 2 or more people
2. contribute copyrightable material and
3. mutually intend to create a joint work (i.e., they intend that their contributions be merged into inseparable or interdependent parts of a whole)
4. the work is a "joint work" and the contributors are "joint authors."

It is absolutely crucial that each person expect their contributions to be merged into a whole and that they intend to be joint owners.

Note that a work can be considered a "joint work" even in the absence of a written agreement between the authors.

So what does it mean to be a "joint author"?

Joint authors are co-owners of the copyright in the joint work.

When I say "co-owners," I do not mean that one author owns some particular part of the work and another author owns another part. 

I am referring to the copyright in the work, and all authors own an "undivided interest" in the entire copyright.

Thus, all joint authors are entitled to all the rights of authorship that an individual author would be entitled to.  The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint authors to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright.

Can anyone be a joint author?

No.  If you want to be a joint author, you cannot just sit on the sidelines making armchair suggestions. 

Additionally, exercising control and discretion as the work is created or having final approval rights over the work alone will usually not make you a joint author.

Your contribution to the joint work must in and of itself be copyrightable.  This means that it must be an original (not copied) contribution that is fixed in some tangible form.

What if one joint author contributes more than the other joint authors?

It does not matter.  As long as all authors contribute copyrightable material and mutually intend a joint work - the work is considered a joint work.  All joint authors own an equal share in the work.

What if each joint author contributes distinctly separate parts?

It does not matter.  As long as the distinct parts come together in an inseparable or interdependent whole and the authors intend a joint work - the work is considered a joint work.  All joint authors own an "undivided interest" in the entire work. 

How does licensing work in joint authorship situations?

Unless they have a written agreement to the contrary, any joint author (without the permission of the other joint authors) can grant non-exclusive licenses to third parties to exploit the work - provided that the other joint authors get an equal share of the licensing proceeds.

However, no single joint author can give a third party an exclusive copyright license.  Licenses for joint works are non-exclusive - unless all joint authors agree to exclusivity.

Are joint authors entitled to a share of licensing fees?

Yes, unless a written agreement between them says otherwise.  Along with the right of each joint author to issue non-exclusive licenses for the work, each joint author has a duty to account to the other joint authors for any profits obtained from licensing.

Can 1 joint author assign his or her rights in the work?

Yes.  A joint author can assign his or her ownership share in the work to a third party or leave it to an heir in a will.  However, a single joint author cannot assign the entire copyright to a third party without the explicit written permission of the other joint authors.

What about authorship credit?

If the joint work is ever published, each joint author is entitled to equal authorship credit - unless a signed, written agreement says otherwise.

The most common example of a joint work is a book or article with 2 or more authors.

However, if the book is written mostly by 1 author, with another author contributing a single chapter for which they are given independent credit, this probably would not be classified as a joint work. 

The authors' contributions are not inseparable or interdependent, and the fact that the chapter author only received credit for the chapter would be evidence that there was no intent for joint authorship of the entire book.

So - can 2 or more authors contribute to a work without being considered joint authors?

At this point, I hope your answer is clearly "yes."

If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole or did not intend to be joint authors, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work.

Rather, the result is considered a "collective work." Each author owns a copyright only in what they contributed to the finished product.

Consider the following example from the Stanford University Copyright & Fair Use website:

HYPO:  In the 1950s, Vladimir writes a famous novel full of complex literary allusions.  In the 1980s, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations written by an English professor.  The student edition is a collective work.  Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.

Click here to read the previous article - Copyright:  Authorship Basics

Here are the subsequent articles - Works For Hire and Assignments of Copyright.

edited by Howie Cockrill, Esq.

Comments

[Donnie]

I have a serious questions. I was in a band that desolved due to internal strife. I wrote all the music on paper and lyrics (the composer) and my bandmates played the music (the arrangers). We also recorded the music as well. Who owns the music both written and recorded?

[tony berman]

The person or persons who write the music and lyrics are the owners of the song, unless ownership was assigned to a third party such as a publishing company. If the band members helped to write the music or lyrics, they may be co-authors. Usually this would refer to contributions to the main melody of the song and the associated lyrics. The contributions of band members (in the rock context) rarely amount to a copyrightable arrangement, but there are exceptions. The copyright in the sound recordings is owned by the musicians who performed on the recording, unless they assigned it to a third party such as a record company. (Sometimes a producer also has a claim to the copyright in the sound recording.)

[S.B.]

I am a music producer, as well as a composer & arranger. In working on a project of mine I sought out a particular artist to write and record to my song, but i also wrote lyrics to the song as well. I wrote the choras specifically, as well as composing and arranging the music. I'd like to know how should i go about copyrighting the song, do I have the sole rights to this work, or would this be considered a co authorship? also dose this matter if I have payed the artist to write and perform on the project?

[8]

I produced an album with a writer/performing artist. I co-wrote and performed on a few songs, as he composed a couple tracks. We agreed the end result (album) was of equal total work, and he created a pseudo name for our collaboration. I pressed and distributed the album independently. We know longer work and perform together (for over a year now) and I tend to see the album listed and distributed under his name, instead of the pseudo name we registered the album and copyrights. Is there any copyright violation?

[Anarchist]

I wrote several songs with a band that I recently left. After this, we drew up and signed a contract which established that these songs would have to be re-written by both parties to separate each joint work into two separate works, each belonging to its respective contributing writer. Each author, therefore, would no longer be allowed use material written by the other without his permission.

However, after this agreement was made, the father of one of the band members wrote a letter stating that the agreement was an obstruction of justice against "joint ownership" and that the contract was null and void.

The band is now intending to disregard the contract completely and continue to use the songs in their entirety without my permission.

QUESTION:
Does the band have the right to ignore the contract it signed with me? Can Joint Ownership really hold precedence over the signed agreement and nullify it?

[Brian]

Question:

Say I am an artist. I ask you to scribble a random line on a piece of paper. I take your scribble and study it, turn it. Eventually, I add my own marks, lines, color, and title to the work. (see the Australian children's program "Mr Squiggle" as an example)

You knew that this was my intention when you gave me the scribble; that it would be used in a finished design, but you have no idea what the finished design will be, nor any control over it. It's kind of a parlor game.

What, if any, are your rights/ownership of the finished design?

Do I, as the artist, need to get you to sign/agree to some kind of contract assigning me full ownership of the finished product?

[Steve Heroux]

I recorded my lead guitar tracks with a band, who( two of the members) procedeed to make 2 cds.My playing is distinctly on 8 of the songs. Nothing was ever done with the cds(1986, and 1989), until NOW, these guys are regrouping, I'm not with them, but saw a recent Ustream broadcast of them. They are beginning to offer the cds for sale, and are in the process of building an "Eden" website. (The band's name).. What can I do to alert them to the fact that this was a joint work, before they get too far with it?

[Invertir en oro]

I think that this post is very good, i would like to read more information about this topic.

[Fashion clothing store]

Has read all in detail, excellent blog! I'd like to know how should i go about copyrighting the song, do I have the sole rights to this work, or would this be considered a co authorship? also dose this matter if I have payed the artist to write and perform on the project?

[isis maternity]

I like this.Additionally, exercising control and discretion as the work is created or having final approval rights over the work alone will usually not make you a joint author. Good Luck

[Camarad]

Thanks for the information! I'd like to know how should i go about copyrighting the song, do I have the sole rights to this work, or would this be considered a co authorship? also dose this matter if I have payed the artist to write and perform on the project?

[Mia Kirshner]

Thanks for the information! It does not matter. As long as the distinct parts come together in an inseparable or interdependent whole and the authors intend a joint work - the work is considered a joint work. All joint authors own an "undivided interest" in the entire work.

[Indian Pharmacy]

I'm against copyright! Is just another plague from the corporative CEO.

[4rx]

I think that this is really interesting, In my opinion I can learn a lot if I still reading your posts !